Archive for August 10, 2008

Source: The N&O

The Durham Environmental Affairs Board, along with the Public Health and Emergency Management Directors, will present findings about the impact of the biodefense lab planned for Butner on Monday night.

The findings will be presented to the Durham County Board of Commissioners. The board will also receive comments from the public following the presentations.

The meeting will be held at 7 p.m. Monday, on the second floor of the county courthouse, 200 East Main St.

Federal officials are considering building the $450 million facility, which would study large-animal diseases.

For more information about the Board of County Commissioners meeting, contact the Clerk to the Board at 919 560-0025.



Federal officials are barnstorming the country staging daylong hearings on a proposed federal disease research lab, and locals are reacting with everything from dignitary-laden pep rallies to rowdy protests.

Athens residents soon will get their last chance to weigh in.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security returns to town Thursday for its third and final presentation on the National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility, a 500,000-square-foot, $500 million laboratory where researchers will study incurable infectious animal diseases like foot-and-mouth.

Federal officials already have stopped at the other five finalists for the NBAF – San Antonio, Manhattan, Kan.; Butner, N.C.; Flora, Miss., and two towns near Plum Island, N.Y. – as well as Washington, D.C.

In North Carolina, about 200 protesters turned out at a July 29 hearing, according to the Raleigh News & Observer. Among them was Athens activist Grady Thrasher. One resident dressed up as the Grim Reaper and another threatened to dismantle bulldozers if the NBAF comes to Butner, Thrasher said, but he doesn’t expect similar theatrics in Athens.

“We view ourselves as maybe a little too sophisticated,” he said.

David Lee, vice president for research at the University of Georgia, said he knows opponents will outnumber supporters Thursday, but he is hoping for legitimate questions rather than grandstanding.

“I’m afraid what it’s going to turn out to be is kind of a circus of folks feeling like they have to make a statement on whether NBAF should be here or not, which is not really the purpose of the meeting,” said Lee, who’s leading the state’s effort to land NBAF for a site on South Milledge Avenue.

Other than North Carolina, Athens is the only finalist with a large organized opposition, although Kansas is developing one, said Judy Winters, a member of the Granville Non-violent Action Team, a North Carolina group fighting the NBAF.

Press coverage of hearings in other states largely has been positive.

Researchers, veterinarians and government officials spoke overwhelmingly in favor of bringing the NBAF to Texas at a hearing last Thursday, according to the Associated Press.

A hearing in Mississippi last Tuesday drew Gov. Haley Barbour and 350 other people, almost all in favor of the lab, according to the Jackson Clarion-Ledger.

A handful of Kansans, including farmers and engineers, criticized the lab at a July 31 hearing in Kansas, but Kansas State University academics and state officials, including Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, told Homeland Security that Manhattan is the best choice, the Topeka Capitol-Journal reported.

In New York, though, officials like U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton and Rep. Tim Bishop have said they don’t want a high-security lab like the NBAF on Plum Island, home of the moderate-security Plum Island Animal Disease Center that NBAF will replace.

And in North Carolina, opposition continues to mount. Many local officials have withdrawn their support – including, most recently, the Raleigh City Council and U.S. Rep. Brad Miller, D-N.C. They cited the project’s unpopularity and Homeland Security’s unwillingness to answer questions.

“I cannot support bringing a federal facility to a community in my district that does not welcome it,” Miller said in a news release Tuesday. “I continue to believe that we must do the research that would be conducted at the proposed facility to protect public health and our food supply, whether at the current location at Plum Island or elsewhere, and that wherever the research is done it must be done safely.”

Georgia and Athens officials, including U.S. Rep. Paul Broun, R-Athens, the rest of Georgia’s congressional delegation, Gov. Sonny Perdue, Mayor Heidi Davison and county commissioners, still are on board with efforts to bring the NBAF to the 67-acre UGA-owned tract off South Milledge Avenue.

Davison said Homeland Security has answered her questions and she is satisfied so far that the lab will be safe. Opponents aren’t keeping an open mind, she said.

“I don’t have the sense that (Homeland Security has) been withholding information,” she said. “They’re simply not going to like the answers.”

Thrasher and Kathy Prescott, founders of the local anti-NBAF group For Athens Quality-of-life, said nothing can sway them that building the NBAF anywhere but on an island is a good idea.

“At this point, there’s nothing that will change my mind about this lab,” Prescott said.

At the two Athens hearings, scheduled for 12:30 p.m. and 6 p.m. Thursday at the Georgia Center for Continuing Education, federal officials will present findings from a draft environmental impact statement released in June, then take questions and comments.

“I think it will be very similar to the (previous) meetings,” UGA spokeswoman Terry Hastings said.

The 1,000-page report includes information on infrastructure needs, potential environmental damage, economic benefits and safety precautions for each of the six finalists.

If it’s built in Athens, the lab would bring in 326 jobs with a $20 million payroll and create 226 jobs for locals, according to the study. On the downside, construction might temporarily pollute the Middle Oconee River, the massive facility will be visible from surrounding areas, water and sewer lines to the site need to be expanded and nearby roads will need to be improved.

The study says pathogens – among them the highly contagious livestock disease foot-and-mouth and a few viruses that animals can transmit to humans – are extremely unlikely to escape from the lab. If they did, the economic hit to the region could top $4 billion, but proponents say the research conducted will be invaluable if a natural outbreak occurred.

Opponents, though, say they’re afraid a rogue scientist like Bruce Ivins, a Maryland researcher who killed himself last week as federal authorities prepared to charge him with unleashing anthrax attacks in 2001, could smuggle pathogens out of the NBAF and spread them around Athens.

They also want to ask about Homeland Security’s plan to exterminate the local deer population or spray for mosquitoes if an outbreak occurs.

Others are likely to question the job and payroll figures, the lab’s water and sewer needs and whether Homeland Security plans to incinerate carcasses or sanitize and dissolve them in an acid bath.


The U.S. Department of Homeland Security returns to Athens on Thursday for its third and final presentation on the National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility, a 500,000-square-foot, $500 million laboratory where researchers will study incurable infectious animal diseases like foot-and-mouth.

The hearings will focus on a 1,000-page environmental impact study released in June. Residents will have two opportunities to gather information, ask questions and make comments about the project. Homeland Security is also accepting written comments through Aug. 25.

National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility hearings

12:30-4:30 p.m. and 6-10 p.m. Thursday

Georgia Center for Continuing Education, 1197 S. Lumpkin St.

Parking deck next door

On the Web:

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security returns to Athens on Thursday for its third and final presentation on the National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility, a 500,000-square-foot, $500 million laboratory where researchers will study incurable infectious animal diseases like foot-and-mouth.

The hearings will focus on a 1,000-page environmental impact study released in June. Residents will have two opportunities to gather information, ask questions and make comments about the project. Homeland Security is also accepting written comments through Aug. 25.



Published in the Athens Banner-Herald on 081008

This is an excerpt from Jeffrey St. Clair’s new environmental history, Born Under a Bad Sky, now available from AK Press / CounterPunch Books.

Pools of Fire

Source: Jeffrey St.Clair – CounterPunch

Looking for weapons of mass destruction? Try the backwoods of North Carolina. The site is easy to find. You don’t need infrared telemetry, informants, or a global positioning satellite. Just follow the railroad tracks deep into the heart of the triangle area to the gleaming cooling tower of the Shearon Harris nuclear plant, which rises like a concrete beacon out of the forest.

It may not look like much—a run-of-the-mill nuke—but inside the confines of the steel fence that rings the plant, resides one of the most lethal patches of ground in North America. Shearon Harris is not just a nuclear power-generating station, but a repository for highly radioactive spent fuel rods from two other nuclear plants owned by Progress Energy.

Those railroad tracks? They’re for hauling nuclear waste. The spent fuel rods are carted by rail from the Brunswick and Robinson nuclear reactors to Shearon Harris, where they are stored in four densely packed pools, filled with circulating cold water to keep the waste from heating up. The pools are interconnected and enclosed within one building. That building is attached to the reactor itself. Together, they form the largest radioactive waste storage pools in the country.

All this makes Shearon Harris a very inviting target for would-be terrorists. In fact, the Department of Homeland Security has fingered Shearon Harris as one of the most vulnerable terrorist targets in the nation.

Potential atomic terrorists don’t have to steal plutonium, take a crash course in physics, or concoct a bomb to manufacture a radiological nightmare scenario in the heart of the Carolinas. All they have to do is penetrate the security fence of a lightly guarded commercial reactor and find a way to ignite the pools of high-level radioactive waste. The easiest method is to disrupt the circulation of the water system that keeps the pools cool.

The resulting fire would be virtually unquenchable. Moreover, because the water system that feeds the waste pools is also connected to the Shearon Harris reactor, a pool fire could also trigger a nuclear meltdown. And so it goes.

An uncontrolled pool fire and meltdown at Shearon Harris would put more than two million residents of this rapidly growing section of North Carolina in extreme peril. A recent study by the Brookhaven Labs, not known to overstate nuclear risks, estimates that a pool fire could cause 140,000 cancers, contaminate thousands of square miles of land, and cause over $500 billion in off-site property damage.

An October 2000 report from the Sandia Labs in Albuquerque painted a grim picture of the consequences from a pool fire. The report, which was kept under wraps for two years by the NRC, found that a waste pool fire could spread radioactive debris over a 500-mile radius, including Cesium-137, a carcinogen linked to birth defects and genetic damage.

When details from this report leaked out to the press, Mike Easley, the governor of North Carolina, responded by ordering that iodine pills be distributed to neighbors of the plant. It was a touching gesture. But iodine is no defense against the ravages of Cesium-137.

Despite vows of beefed up security by the nuclear industry, it’s not that difficult to break into most commercial nuclear plants and security at Shearon Harris is notoriously lax. In 1999, NRC records show that two Progress energy employees gained access to the reactor and the waste pools without security clearance. The energy company has hired numerous employees with questionable security backgrounds, including three guards who failed psychological exams and one with a criminal record.

The whole plant could go up without the intervention of terrorists. Basic mismanagement and design flaws in the plant could well do the trick. In fact, the NRC has estimated that there’s a 1:100 chance of a pool fire happening under the rosiest scenario. And the dossier on the Shearon Harris plant is far from rosy.

In 1999, the nuclear plant experienced four emergency shutdowns, or SCRAMS. The problems led plant managers to tell the Charlotte News and Observer that they were “very disappointed,” engaged in “soul searching,” and unsure whether the string of malfunctions were “coincidental or a sign of deeper problems.”

A few months later, in April 2000, the plant’s safety monitoring system, designed to provide early warning of a serious emergency, failed. It wasn’t the first time. Indeed, the emergency warning system at Shearon Harris has failed fifteen times since the plant opened in 1987.

Between January and July of 2002, Harris plant managers were forced to manually shut down the reactors four times. Then in August of that year, the plant automatically shut itself down when the outside power grid weakened.

Documents uncovered from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission reveal other problems at Shearon Harris. Inspectors have found “rubber and other foreign material” clogging the cooling lines in the plant’s heat removal system. There are also internal memos from the plant reporting that many of its evacuation sirens within the ten-mile emergency zone surrounding the plant are inoperable during severe weather.

In 2002 the NRC put the plant on notice about nine unresolved safety issues detected during a fire prevention inspection by NRC investigators. The plant was hit with a “Security Level III Notice of Violation.” When the NRC returned to the plant a few months later for a reinspection, it determined that the corrective actions were “not acceptable.”

“Progress Energy is far above the industry average in three important areas: emergency reactor shutdowns, required inspections, and the fact that it has interconnected Harris reactor’s cooling system to four high-level waste pools: the largest in the nation,” says Jim Warren, executive director of North Carolina WARN.

The problems continue with a chilling regularity. In the spring of 2003 there were four emergency shut downs of the plant, including three SCRAMs over a four-day period in the middle of May. One of the incidents occurred when the reactor core failed to cool down during a refueling operation while the reactor dome was off of the plant—a potentially catastrophic series of events.

Between 1999 and 2003, there were twelve major problems requiring the shutdown of the plant. According to the NRC, the national average for commercial reactors is one shutdown per eighteen months.

The situation at Shearon Harris is made more dire by virtue of the fact that the reactor is directly tied into the cooling system for the spent fuel pools. A breakdown (or sabotage) in either system could lead to serious consequences in the other.

Congressman David Price, the North Carolina Democrat, sent the Nuclear Regulatory Commission a study of the situation by scientists at MIT and Princeton. The report pinpointed the waste pools as the biggest risk at the plant. “Spent fuel recently discharged from a reactor could heat up relatively rapidly and catch fire,” wrote Bob Alvarez, a former advisor to the Department of Energy and co-author of the report. “The fire could well spread to older fuel. The long-term land contamination consequences of such an event could be significantly worse than Chernobyl.”

The study recommended that the spent fuel pools be replaced with low-density, open frame racks and that the older waste assemblages be placed in hardened, above-ground storage units. The change could be done relatively cheaply, costing the energy giant about $5 million a year—less than the $6.6 million annual bonus for Progress CEO Warren Cavanaugh.

But Progress scoffed at the idea and recruited the help of NRC Commissioner Edward McGaffigan to smear the MIT/Princeton report. In an internal memo, McGaffigan instructed NRC staffers to produce “a hard-hitting critique that sort of undermines the study deeply.”

McGaffigan is a veteran cold-warrior and a nuclear zealot, who has worked for both Democrats and Republicans. A veteran of the National Security Council in the Reagan administration, McGaffigan took a special interest in promoting nuclear plants to US client states. He left the White House to serve as the chief policy aide on energy and defense issues for Senator Jeff Bingaman, the Democrat from New Mexico. In 1996, President Clinton appointed him to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, where he became a tireless proponent of nuclear power on the ludicrous grounds that it will slow the onslaught of global warming. McGaffigan has also consistently dismissed the risks associated with the transport and storage of nuclear waste. Just prior to leaving office, Clinton reappointed him to another full term in 2000.

McGaffigan’s meddling outraged many anti-nuke activists. “There’s a huge credibility in the federal regulatory agencies,” said Lewis Pitts, an environmental attorney in North Carolina. “After 9/11, the nuclear industry faked a report to convince the public that an airplane hitting a nuke plant is nothing to worry about and now the NRC has directed the production of a bogus study to deny decades of science on the perils of pool fires.”

If the worst happens, the blame will reside in Washington, which has permitted the Shearon Harris facility to become a nuclear time bomb. The atomic clock is ticking.

H/T Tom and Popi

%d bloggers like this: